Paranormal Stories
   
   ------------------------------------------------------   
   Home
   ------------------------------------------------------   
   Latest content
   ------------------------------------------------------   
   Submit new content »
   ( Smileys )
   ------------------------------------------------------   
   Subsection: MALACHI
   ------------------------------------------------------   
   Hall Of Shame (content)
   Hall Of Shame (replies)
Archive
   _____________  :(  ...2012
   ________________...2011
   _______________...2010
   ______________...2009
   _____________...2008
   ____________...2007
   ___________...2006
   __________...2005
   _________...2004
   ________...2003
   _______...2002
   ...News archive
   ...Site history
Contact
   Opinions and suggestions

NASA photos confirm moon is artificial
by Zen Gardner

According to David Icke's postulation regarding the Moon Matrix, and based on the research of many others who've studied the moon's many anomalies, the moon is an artificial orb that was pulled here for specific gravitational and other earth controlling purposes.

The recent striking NASA photos of the moon give a very clear impression.

First, it's obvious the moon is hardly geographically similar to the earth. You see no huge irregular ridges like earth's massive mountain ranges or deep trenches such as those within our oceans. (see photos below)

But even more than that, the moon very much does look like a metallic sphere with a dust covering that has been hit many times over but only to a specific depth--much like the affect of rain drops on a hard surface with a substantial covering of dust.

Here's the new NASA photo and story:

Say cheese! NASA captures stunning images of the far side of the moon

These amazing pictures capture the moon's cratered surface in the most intricate detail ever recorded.

The images, which were taken by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), have boosted the resolution of images of the far side of the moon over 100 times.

Digital elevation and terrain maps based on the new data reveal the heavily cratered and bumpy surface of the moon in all its complexity.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1339743/Pictured-Incredible-lunar-images-reveal-moon-craters-unparalleled-detail.html


Fascinating detail: A topographic map of the moon's southern hemisphere based on data from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter on board NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft

Dr Gregory Neumann of NASA'S Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said that digital elevation and terrain maps based on the new data 'will be a fundamental reference for future scientific and human exploration missions to the moon.'

The brilliant, iridescent green concepts, pictured here, show the topography of different hemispheres of the moon.


Heavily cratered: A topographic map of the moon's northern hemisphere. The false colours indicate elevation: red areas are highest and blue lowest

Dr Neumann said: 'After about one year taking data, we already have nearly 3 billion data points from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter on board the LRO spacecraft.

'We expect to continue to make measurements at this rate through the next two years of the science phase of the mission and beyond. Near the poles, we expect to provide near-GPS-like navigational capability as coverage is denser due to the spacecraft's polar orbit.'


Moon atlas... at last? A topographic map centered on the Apollo 15 landing site

The Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) works by sending a laser pulse through an optical lense that splits it into five beams that are each scattered back after they strike the lunar surface.

From the return pulse, LOLA determines the time of flight which, accounting for the speed of light, reveals the distance from the spacecraft to the lunar surface.

The positional errors of image mosaics of the lunar far side have been between one and ten kilometres (about 0.62 to 6.2 miles), Neumann said.

He added: 'We're beating these down to the level of 30 metres (almost 100 feet) or less spatially and one metre (almost 3.3 feet) vertically.'

_______________________________________________

Now contrast that with the irregular contours of the earth:



Not very regular...



Again, very irregular. Topographical satellite mapping from science.co.il

I don't know. But it's hard to see how the moon broke off from the earth and it remained a perfect sphere with hundreds of huge raindrop type pock marks, while the earth is this convoluted, seemingly traumatized molten rock in comparison - and with hardly any visible craters.
Other Anomalies

The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, made the statement, 'A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object'. But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite---and therefore artificial.

Rings Like A Bell

Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow ob-ject' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. (http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/01jan/moon.html)

And why does the moon have hundreds of massive craters, while the earth has hardly any in comparison? I know our atmosphere burns some up, but those marks indicate some pretty big shots it's taken, never mind the quantity.
Did you Know the Crater Bottoms Are Convex Instead of Concave?

It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal---which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick---mostly metal. (http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/01jan/moon.html)

pace warfare activities here or in other parts of the Universe?

I don't know if it was brought here or who lives on or in it, but I don't buy the party line. There's a lot going on out there and those who could confirm a lot more information for us won't. Thankfully wonderful research is being made, and some 'in the know' are speaking up, and the dots are connecting.

Something to think about.

Just wondering. Zen

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/317/206/NASA_Photos_Confirm_Moon_is_Artificial.html


/``-_-´´
2010-12-21 22:47
(direct link)
 
 
   Discuss or make a comment on this article »
( No registration needed! Speak freely. )
  Title :
Message : Signature :

 
 
.
di8ck monkeys

/.35, 013, 14, 23, 36, 366, 453, 5., 5344, 5435, 559+, 56, choche, gov, injun tone, injun71, injun71,tone, vjuvki  (2012-03-06 22:15) (direct link)
 
 
Pink Floy - Dark side of the moon


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLOth-BuCNY

/anonymous  (2012-02-13 20:48) (direct link)
 
 
Deathstar Moon
Has someone found the hole, so we can send Luke to blow the damn thing up? No?

On the serious side....NASA has had the habit of faking shit, including making FAKE MOONS, in order to create the illusion of GOING THERE in the first place. It`s hard to make heads or tails out of all the LIES and iNCONSISTENCIES coming out of NASA. FIrst there was no water on the moon....Now there is water on the moon...And it seems the only ones who want to even think about the Dark side of the Moon is PINK FLOYD!

Want to see some photos of the fake moons created by NASA? Check out this video... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWgHmBtUUCo Apollo Missions (Behind the Scenes)

When will people begin to realize that NASA is not to be trusted. They won`t even take decent photos of the EARTH, with the stars surrounding it? Taxpayer fraud is rampant in that organization!!

/Lunarcy Productions  (2012-02-13 15:31) (direct link)
 
 
Re: What`s it made of?
Imagine what an awesome spaceship one could build with such material. It would almost last forever.
/``-_-´´  (2012-02-11 03:05) (direct link)
 
 
What`s it made of?
The moon is made of some type of metal that is 20 miles thick
/Roger  (2012-02-10 23:19) (direct link)
 
 
If the moon is artificial...
...I wonder what kind of material it is made of that can take so much damage without breaking apart.

/``-_-´´  (2012-02-10 05:13) (direct link)
 
 
Think again
With all the supposed meteor strikes on the moon, some craters being more than 200 miles in diameter, shouldn`t they be a bit deeper than craters only a few miles wide? The moon is artificial. Wake up!!!
/Roger  (2012-02-10 01:32) (direct link)
 
 
Coninued.
The reason the moon has so many is because it acts as a shield for Earth. Without our loyal moon Earth would have been struck Barron from the shock of the blows long ago. While the moon may be artificial it still acts as a shield.
And if you think about it it may have been placed, as to protect us from a hostile planet.

/Sequoia DuBeau  (2012-02-10 00:42) (direct link)
 
 
Explanation.
I agree that you have some good evidence. The concave craters, mass, density , location and depth; one thing I feel that I should clear up is the question you stated about the freaquency of craters on the moon, and the lack on Earth
/Sequoia DuBeau  (2012-02-10 00:38) (direct link)
 
 
NASA KNOWS
We`ve been lied to for a very long time. We either don`t need to know the truth, or we can`t handle the truth. "They" have been on the moon for millions of years, they may even be the reason we are here. But without a doubt the moon is artificial, be it created and pulled there, (or flown there) but the truth is, they don`t want us there. Even Armstrong said we were warned off the moon. Why? Because it`s theirs. we aren`t ready to join those out there, as a species, with our war-making baggage will either evolve and take our place among those that have been there a very long time, or we will be just one of the countless footnotes of history."Those on the third rock didn`t make it". One thing is certain, we are at a critical point in human history. We will either "grow up" as a species or we will die out. The American Government knows what`s going on but we aren`t ready for the "truth".
/Roger  (2012-02-09 23:19) (direct link)
 
 
ha
was it a joke
/abc  (2011-02-04 07:51) (direct link)
 
 
BS
what a crock
/eric  (2011-01-29 17:52) (direct link)
 
 
evolution next gen....
more than meets the eye.....there`s more to the world,than we, or the dudes in the labcoats know...i guess its one of those things. !
/silversword1990  (2010-12-27 16:36) (direct link)
 
 
plate tectonics
The earth is not even because of plate tectonics... the moon doesn`t have a hot molten core like earth does because of its size, so there are no plates that can move.. gravity caused the moon to form smooth when it was in a molten state.
/Joe  (2010-12-27 07:39) (direct link)